「華人戴明學院」是戴明哲學的學習共同體 ,致力於淵博型智識系統的研究、推廣和運用。 The purpose of this blog is to advance the ideas and ideals of W. Edwards Deming.

2013年8月3日 星期六

品質眾生相 (75-78): 夠好"的品質 還不足以成功.“Good Enough” Just Isn’t/ 紐約繁體時報中文版

 品質眾生相 (78):


約22 年前. 印度Madurai 某大廠商主管來內壢杜邦公司訪問
所有的管理人之中我對他最友善.
那位總經理給我幾本彩色書 包括印刷精美的 Know Madurai .
我保留它 當一種友情的紀念

2006.8.8

Google to extend expertise to Aravind Eye Hospital
Hindu - Chennai,India
Madurai, Aug. 7 (PTI): Global IT major Google is to extend its expertise in Information Technology to the world famous Aravind Eye Hospital here. ...


2005.7.9

Telemedicine brings quality care to Tamil Nadu:-
Webindia123 - India
Madurai (Tamil Nadu), July 8 : A strategic public-private partnership launched here Friday will make quality healthcare within easy reach of the poor people in ...


品質眾生相 (77)
博客來的網路資料: 書名已說是英詩   語言卻標繁體中文

于漪英文詩選



品質眾生相 (76):

紐約時報中文版內容豐富 翻譯水平也不錯. 遺憾的是它的標點符號有問題 (繁體版的問題之一. 姑且不談簡體轉為繁體之"字"問題.......)
它的亮點包括許多間溫室、養育了多種棕櫚樹和熱帶植物、太后時代紀念花園(Queen Mother』s Memorial Garden)和專註於蘇格蘭高地(Scottish highlands)植物的蘇格蘭希斯花園(Scottish Heath Garden)。



品質眾生相 (75): 這篇說"夠好"的品質  (可能)還不足以成功. 在中國中產階層市場如此. 其他開發國的基本市場等類似....
Posted: July 9, 2013
John Jullens
John Jullens is a partner with Booz & Company based in Shanghai. He co-leads the firm’s engineered products and services practice in Greater China. He blogs at www.johnjullens.com.

China’s Mid-Market: Where “Good Enough” Just Isn’t

It’s no secret that China is, or soon will be, the world’s largest market for numerous products—from luxury goods such as Gucci handbags and Mercedes sedans to more mundane industrial products such as hydraulic excavators and combine harvesters. But for many multinationals, the must-win market in China is the country’s often much larger and faster-growing segment of mid-market business customers and middle class consumers who have just crossed the disposable income threshold and can now afford to purchase manufactured goods and services. And the Chinese mid-market is not just where the money is, it’s also an indispensable source of sales volume and associated scale advantages. Moreover, this market is rapidly becoming a springboard for sales to other emerging markets and, in some cases, is even beginning to tap into latent demand for low-cost consumer products in developed markets.
Conventional wisdom has held that Chinese customers demand merely “good enough” products that offer acceptable performance and quality at price points that can be as much as 60 percent or more below their world-class equivalents. Unfortunately, the good enough moniker, although not incorrect and certainly catchy, is a bit misleading. It implies inferior, lower-quality products; thus, many MNC executives thus mistakenly believe that they can succeed in the Chinese mid-market simply by “dumbing down” the consumer products they sell elsewhere. But in reality, selling to China’s mid-market often requires products that have been significantly adapted, or even specifically designed from the ground up, to meet these customers’ unique needs. And such products will likely have to be supported by completely different business models and specialized capabilities.
In other words, good enough often isn’t good enough at all. Many MNCs will find it quite challenging to compete in the Chinese mid-market, especially against the numerous ambitious domestic competitors that may not yet have developed world-class technology and brands, but whose own capabilities to design, manufacture, and sell mid-market products are actually “world class” in their own right. These Chinese mid-market innovators are beginning to shake up the global competitive landscape, and increasingly represent a major threat to well-established global manufacturers everywhere.
Precisely what a winning mid-market strategy will look like is, of course, different for each firm. But the following seven principles apply to most multinationals in most industries, and they can help you compete to win.
1. Develop distinctive mid-market products. It is important to make a clear distinction between low-cost versions of existing products that were originally designed for customers in developed markets and low-priced products that were specifically developed for the often unique requirements of Chinese customers—because the former may not be sufficient. Either way, multinationals must consider when and how to reduce noncritical functionality while simultaneously adding other locally required product features, substitute simplified off-the-shelf components and cheaper materials, and redesign products for ease of manufacturing and serviceability.
2. Design a mid-market business model. Many multinationals will have to completely rethink their existing business models to support mid-market products. They’ll need to focus on acquisition price and near-term operating costs versus productivity and lifetime cost of ownership, will-fit instead of proprietary replacement parts, and after-sales service through independent distributors instead of company-owned stores, as well as developing a truly local supply base and finding ways of offering creative financing options to cash-strapped mid-market customers.
3. Pursue value chain migration. It will almost always prove necessary to transfer core value chain activities to China to narrow the cost gap with domestic mid-market competitors to acceptable levels through local manufacturing, sourcing, and supply chain management. In addition, many multinationals will have to develop significant local innovation capabilities, as Western engineers are seldom capable of the ultra-low-cost engineering required in China.
4. Seek out selective partnerships. Due to China’s complexity and size, most multinationals will need to acquire, or partner with, one or more local players to fill gaps in their product portfolios; to gain complementary mid-market product development and manufacturing capabilities; to develop the optimal channel footprint; to negotiate with regulators at the local, regional, and national levels; and, in some sectors, merely to gain market access.
5. Craft a multi-brand strategy. Some multinationals resist adopting a multi-brand strategy on the grounds that mid-market customers will, over time, become premium customers. Aside from the fact that this may not always be true, it is difficult to stretch a brand over too many price points without diluting the value proposition and brand equity over time, especially when there are different business models involved.
6. Establish a strong local organization. In addition to localizing the firm’s operations, it will likely be necessary to localize management, which can be challenging when the firm is organized around global product divisions. Multinationals have to clarify decision rights and put in place a strong governance structure. Many multinationals should also consider treating their nascent China business as a standalone entity with its own P&L to make sure it gets the resources it needs, at least during the incubation and initial growth stages.
7. Adopt a global mind-set. A firm’s success in China is tied directly to the mind-set of its top managers elsewhere. At a minimum, it will be important to ensure that headquarters has a basic understanding of China’s opaque, and often misunderstood, business and regulatory context.
Many multinationals will find it exceptionally difficult to win in the Chinese mid-market, especially smaller- and medium-sized firms that lack the financial and managerial resources to develop and implement a comprehensive China strategy, as well as those firms that produce basic industrial goods sold primarily on the basis of their relative price and value position. However, the vast majority of MNCs will have no choice but to find a way to win in China’s mid-market—or risk giving their rivals a crucial competitive advantage.

2013年8月2日 星期五

品質眾生相(40-42): Mr. Bose 高品質音響 / 英國皇家供應商聯誼 / Steinway & Sons 易主之後呢


品質眾生相(42)

Notes of Sorrow in Changes at Steinway

By JAMES BARRON

With Steinway & Sons up for sale, pianists worry that the products just won't be the same.

與Steinway & Sons 產品的緣份。
我跟她說紐約時報近七年前有系列的介紹該公司:

Wikipedia article Steinway & Sons.此文內有一百多條的出處注解,蕭太太給我們看的專書一定在其中。那書前三分之一是介紹其歐美的家族,並說美國的鋼琴製造樹立了世界的標準。接下來的篇幅都記諸名演奏家與該公司的琴緣。

 
爱德华·卡拉斯科在施坦威皇后区的工厂工作。施坦威最近出售了它在曼哈顿的大厦,公司即将迎来新主人
Bryan Thomas for The New York Times
爱德华·卡拉斯科在施坦威皇后区的工厂工作。施坦威最近出售了它在曼哈顿的大厦,公司即将迎来新主人
 Notes of Sorrow in Changes at SteinwayBy JAMES BARRON July 13, 2013音樂施坦威鋼琴易手,音樂人哀嘆JAMES BARRON 2013年07月13日
First, Steinway & Sons closed on the sale of its Beaux-Arts Manhattan building on West 57th Street, where the likes of Sergei Rachmaninoff and Vladimir H​​orowitz once practiced. Three days later, it announced that it was planning to sell the whole company to a private-equity firm that owns more than 15 other medium-size manufacturers, making everything from windshield wipers to sewing machines to coffins.
施坦威(Steinway & Sons)鋼琴公司先是關閉了曼哈頓西57街上那棟學院派建築風格大廈內的生意,謝爾蓋·拉赫瑪尼諾夫(Sergei Rachmaninoff)和弗拉基米爾·霍洛維茨(Vladimir H​​orowitz)等人曾經在那裡練過琴。三天后,它又宣布計劃將整個公司賣給一家私募公司,該公司擁有15家中等規模的其他產品製造商,從汽車雨刷和縫紉機到棺材,無所不包。
For pianists who obsess about all things Steinway — is a brand-new Steinway as good as one from the 1920s, and are those made in Germany preferable to those made in New York? — the developments had the force of a one-two punch. Pianists cherish memories of the first time they set foot in the building and its famous basement, where generations of professional pianists have chosen the Steinways they played at concerts and recording sessions.
新造的施坦威是否會和20世紀20年代製造的施坦威一樣好?在德國製造的施坦威是不是比紐約製造的施坦威要好? ——許多鋼琴家們就是這樣痴迷施坦威的一切,對於他們來說,施坦威的新動向堪稱雙重打擊。鋼琴家們珍惜他們第一次走進這棟大廈以及它那著名的地下室的回憶,一代又一代職業鋼琴家就是在這個地下室選擇在音樂會上和錄音中使用的施坦威鋼琴。
They also worry that new owners could meddle with Steinway's time-honored and time-consuming manufacturing methods. Steinway spends almost a year building each grand piano, and pianists fret that an assembly line speedup at the company's two factories would spoil what they prize: the delicacy of a Steinway's touch, the colorations of its sound.
他們還擔心新主人會插手施坦威歷史悠久和耗時的生產方式。施坦威生產一台三角鋼琴要花費一年時間,鋼琴家們擔心在公司的兩家工廠里安裝高速流水生產線會毀掉他們最珍惜的東西:施坦威鋼琴精美的手感與聲音中豐富的色彩。愛德華·卡拉斯科在施坦威皇后區的工廠工作。施坦威最近出售了它在曼哈頓的大廈,公司即將迎來新主人
Bryan Thomas for The New York Times
愛德華·卡拉斯科在施坦威皇后區的工廠工作。施坦威最近出售了它在曼哈頓的大廈,公司即將迎來新主人
“There's concern any time there's a shift,” the pianist Gary Graffman said. “There's no way of my knowing: will they take as much care with each piano as they have in the past?”
“大家擔心他們會有所改變,”鋼琴家加里·格拉弗曼(Gary Graffman)說,“我無從得知,他們是否會像過去一樣關注每一台鋼琴呢?”
It is a question that has reverberated through the music world since the $438 million deal for the company was announced last week. The offer, which came from the private equity firm Kohlberg & Company, would take Steinway private. It has been traded under the stock symbol LVB, for Ludwig van Beethoven, since Steinway went public in 1996.
上個星期,施坦​​威公司宣布了這筆價值4.38億美元的交易,自那以後,這個問題就一直在音樂界迴響。這筆出價來自私募公司科爾伯格(Kohlberg & Company),它將收購施坦威公司。交易是以LVB,即路德維格·馮·貝多芬(Ludwig van Beethoven)的縮寫這個股票代碼進行的,施坦威自1996年上市以來一直使用這個代碼。
Steinway is now 13 days into a 45-day “go-shop” period, during which it can consider other bids, and at least one portfolio manager whose firm has a stake in Steinway has said the price is too low. Shares of Steinway closed at $36.18 on Friday, $1.18 above Kohlberg's $35-a-share offer.
施坦威擁有45天的“競購期”,在這期間,它可以考慮其他出價,同時需要至少一位其公司擁有施坦威股份的證券投資經紀人聲稱科爾伯格公司的價格過低,今天已到了第13天。週五施坦威股票的收盤價是36.18美元,比科爾伯格提供的35美元一股高出1.18美元。
Kohlberg is “not contemplating any changes to any of the manufacturing operations,” said a Kohlberg investment partner, Christopher W. Anderson, adding that there had been no discussion of closing or moving the factories in Astoria, Queens, and Hamburg, Germany. He would not comment on whether Steinway's top management would remain after the takeover. (Kohlberg's chairman, James A. Kohlberg, has been a director of The New York Times Company since 2008.)
科爾伯格公司目前“並不考慮對製造工序做出任何改變”,公司投資夥伴克里斯托弗·W·安德森(Christopher W. Anderson)補充說,公司沒有討論過關閉或遷移施坦威公司位於皇后區阿斯托利亞和德國漢堡的兩處工廠。對於收購後施坦威公司高層的去留,他表示無可奉告(科爾伯格的總裁詹姆斯·A·科爾伯格[James A. Kohlberg]自2008年開始成為《紐約時報》集團的董事之一)。
Beyond the balance sheet, Mr. Anderson, 38, has an interest in the company's products. “I grew up playing on a Steinway,” he said in an interview this week: an upright that once belonged to his great-grandmother. And on Friday, he posted a letter online to Steinway's dealers in which he said one of Kohlberg's “main goals for Steinway” was to “preserve and support everything that makes a Steinway piano special.” He also said that by going private, Steinway would be “ free from the short-term financial constraints of publicly-traded companies” and would have more latitude to “plan and invest with a long-term perspective.”
除了賬目明細,38歲的安德森先生對施坦威公司的產品也非常感興趣。 “我是彈著施坦威鋼琴長大的,”本週他在接受采訪時說——那是一台從太祖母那裡繼承下來的立式鋼琴。星期五,他在網上發布了一封致施坦威經銷商的公開信,聲稱科爾伯格公司“對施坦威公司的主要意圖”是“維護並支持令施坦威如此特殊的一切東西”。他還說,施坦威公司的股份由私人持有之後,便可以“避免上市公司面臨的短期經濟限制”,可以“計劃和投資長期目標”。
The deal would give Steinway its fifth set of owners. In 1972, the Steinway family — descendants of the immigrant instrument maker who started the company in 1853 — sold it to CBS. That marriage eventually soured, and in the 1980s, Steinway was sold to an investment group from Boston. Steinway changed hands again in the 1990s, when it was bought by what was then Selmer Industries, a band-instrument manufacturer with plants in the Midwest and South. The combined company was led by two investment bankers who had controlled Selmer, Kyle R. Kirkland and Dana D. Messina.
這項交易令施坦威公司迎來了它的第五期主人。 1853年,樂器生產者施坦威家族創立了這個公司,1972年,他們移民美國的後裔將公司賣給了CBS。這項合作很快破裂,20世紀80年代,施坦威被賣給波士頓的一個投資公司,於90年代再度易手,被賣給當時名為塞爾瑪工業(Selmer Industries)的樂隊樂器生產公司,它在中西部和南部擁有工廠。新的聯合公司由塞爾瑪的所有者,投資銀行家凱爾·R·科克蘭德(Kyle R. Kirkland)和戴納·D·麥西納(Dana D. Messina)所有。
Mr. Messina served as chief executive until 2011, stepping down after he and John M. Stoner Jr., the president of the band-instrument division, made a bid to buy everything but the company's piano operations. Steinway began a review of strategic alternatives that ended last December, when it turned down the Stoner-Messina offer and said the company was not for sale. Then came the overture from Kohlberg.
直至2011年,麥西納先生擔任公司首席執行官。與公司樂隊樂器部門負責人小約翰·M·斯通(John M. Stoner Jr.)出價收購公司除鋼琴部門之外的所有部門後,他從施坦威公司辭職。去年12月,施坦威公司拒絕了斯通-麥西納的出價,聲稱公司拒絕出售,並開始研究戰略替代者。之後便迎來了科爾伯格的提議。
Under Mr. Messina's replacement — Michael T. Sweeney, a former president of Starbucks in Britain who is chairman of the holding company for The Minneapolis Star-Tribune — Steinway's financial picture brightened. The company posted a profit of $2.7 million in the first quarter of 2013, up from $590,000 in the first quarter of 2012. Piano sales rose 2.9 percent worldwide.
接替麥西納職位的是英國星巴克的前總裁邁克爾·T·斯維尼(Michael T. Sweeney),如今擔任《明尼阿波利斯星論壇報》(The Minneapolis Star-Tribune)控股公司董事長。在他領導下,施坦威的經濟前景一片光明。公司公佈的2013年第一季度盈利為270萬美元,比起2012年同期的59萬美元大大增加。全球鋼琴銷售額增長了2.9%。
To keep pace with orders in Europe and Asia, Steinway has increased its work force by almost 20 percent in the last year at the Hamburg plant, and Mr. Sweeney said that leaving either New York or Hamburg “would be pushing the self-destruct button for an investor.”
為了滿足歐洲與亞洲的訂單,施坦威公司去年在漢堡的工廠增加了約20%的工人,斯維尼說,假如投資者將工廠搬離紐約或漢堡,“等於按下了自殺鍵”。
He said the building on 57th Street was another matter. He called it old and forbidding — it opened in 1925 down the block and across the street from Carnegie Hall — and a financial burden. Steinway is shopping for space in M​​anhattan, convenient to Carnegie Hall and Lincoln Center, and Mr. Sweeney said he wanted a showroom where the pianos would look like “sculptural objects,” along with a recital hall and practice rooms.
他說,出售57街的建築是另一回事。那棟建築位於卡耐基音樂廳對面,落成於1925年,他說那裡已經是古舊的危房,而且是財政上的負擔。施坦威目前正在曼哈頓購買店面,方便將樂器運往卡耐基音樂廳和林肯中心,斯維尼說他希望新店裡有一個展示廳,可以把鋼琴像“雕塑”一樣陳列,同時還要有一個獨奏廳和若干練琴室。
Steinway must vacate the 57th Street space by the end of next year, and many pianists are sorry it is leaving. “I'm sure I'm with everybody else on this, that it's a shame that building will no longer be Steinway Hall, ” the pianist Emanuel Ax said. “One of the two times that I m​​et Horowitz for five seconds was when they did a celebration in that building after his 1965 return” to performing, at Carnegie Hall. “That was very, very meaningful.”
施坦威必須於明年年底搬出57街的建築,許多鋼琴家都對此感到難過。 “我敢肯定其他人的感受和我一樣,那棟建築不再屬於施坦威,真讓人難堪,”鋼琴家艾曼紐·阿克斯(Emanuel Ax)說。 “我曾在那裡見到過霍洛維茨兩次,其中一次只有五秒鐘,是1965年他重返樂壇時他們在那裡舉行慶祝會,”那場演出是在卡耐基音樂廳。 “那對我來說太有意義了。”


Copyright © 2013 The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.
本文最初發表於2013年7月13日。
翻譯:董楠

品質眾生相(41)
英國皇家供應商聯誼會的團結
Coronation Festival sponsored by the Royal Warrant...


品質眾生相(40)
創造高品質音響. 雇用9000員工
Amar Gopal Bose (1929 – 2013)

Amar G. Bose, chairman of Bose, with a Wave radio in 1993.
Amar G. Bose, Acoustic Engineer and Inventor, Dies at 83

By GLENN RIFKIN

Mr. Bose's namesake company became synonymous with high-quality audio systems and speakers for home users, auditoriums and automobiles.

2013年8月1日 星期四

品質眾生相 (70-74): Canon 檢測187萬台影印機2006/《英漢雙解 出版印刷詞典》/華為電訊-聯想電腦/三星手機性能測試「動手腳」

品質眾生相 (74):

.......評估殘疾人福利的狀況,這是一個直觀卻最真實最重要的指標。社會對殘疾人的權利到底保護到什麼程度?對他們有多少尊重?提供了多少方便?說什麼都是空的,最 根本的就是看結果,看他們能不能最大限度地接近正常人的水準,自由出入於公共場所,享受公共生活。而我們的絕大多數殘疾人,顯然都在公共生活之外,在我們 看不到的地方。他們仿佛不屬於我們的世界,他們生活於跟我們不同的另一個世界。.....http://hchealth.blogspot.tw/2013/08/8296.html

 品質眾生相 (73):

三星手機性能測試「動手腳」

為了取得最佳的手機性能測試結果,三星在Galaxy 4手機上「動了手腳」,好讓測試結果領先其他競爭對手。
科技網站Anand Tech針對搭載Exynos 5 Octa處理器的國際版Galaxy S4手機,進行詳盡的檢驗與測試,結果發現,當用戶使用某些常用來測試手機性能的應用程式時,Galaxy S4的圖形處理器和會以最高速度運作,但如果使用其他一般應用程式,圖形處理器的速度則會減緩。
根據《華爾街日報》旗下科技部落格All things Digital的報導,三星內部列有一份所謂的「白名單」,其中列出了業界常見的性能測試應用程式。Galaxy S4的系統程式碼經過特殊設定,一旦手機偵測到用戶在使用「白名單」上的應用程式,便會自動改轉為「最高性能」模式。
針對Anand Tech的報導內容,三星隨即發表聲明表示,用戶在使用某些需要全螢幕顯示的應用程式或測性能測試應用程式時,圖形處理器確實會轉為最高速度運作模式。但是,三星強調,這麼做目的是「為消費者提供最佳使用者經驗」,而非提高測試分數。
然而,這個解釋卻立即遭到Anand Tech的駁斥。三星列舉出需要全螢幕模式的應用程式時,由於程式設計問題,事實上根本用不上最高速度運作的模式。但是性能測試應用程式,則有需要。換句話說,最高速度運作模式的功能,純粹是為了提高性能測試結果。
就在Anand Tech報導刊出後不久,市場研究公司首席分析師派翠克.莫爾海德(Patrick Moorhead)向All Things Digital記者表示,三星也會運用相同的手法,提高自家研發的應用程式的速度。
三星的行為是否構成作假?問題見人見智。但對消費者來說,這消息似乎表示了測試結果不代表實際使用經驗,一切都只能是參考而已。(吳凱琳編譯)


品質眾生相 (72):

悉尼前美國中央情報局局長海登(Michael Hayden)稱,中國電信康采恩華為從事商務間諜活動。海登週五(7月19日)對《澳大利亞金融評論報》表示,他確信,中國對西方進行無所不包的間諜活動,華為為北京當局蒐集並提供秘密情報。海登稱,毋庸置疑,華為是對美國和澳大利亞的國家安全的威脅。美、英、澳等國均指控華為與當局關係密切,為其提供間諜裝備和網絡襲擊設備。華為對此加以否認。海登稱,西方情報機構掌握有華為受北京旨意從事間諜活動的證據。不過,作為前中情局負責人,他不能公佈細節。去年,美國國會通過一項法案,規定未來不再邀請華為參與美國國家項目競標。澳大利亞政府已將華為排除在寬帶項目競標之外。
----
英美加紐澳防駭 情報局禁聯想電腦

英美為首的「五眼」情報聯盟國家,傳出聯合抵制中國聯想電腦產品。圖為聯想集團五月間在香港展出的平板電腦與手機。(路透)
合組五眼情報聯盟
〔編譯魏國金/綜合報導〕「澳洲金融評論報」報導指出,英國情報單位測試發現中國聯想電腦的電路被修改,致使該品牌電腦出現「後門」,容易被駭入,這項發現導致英國、美國、澳洲、加拿大、紐西蘭五國組成的「五眼」情報聯盟,下令轄下的情報單位禁用聯想電腦。
報導指出,英國情報單位軍情五處(MI5)與政府通訊總部(GCHQ)對聯想電腦進行測試,結果發現電腦的電路已被修改,使其得以在使用者不知情的情況下,遠端存取該電腦。
報導說,據悉在英國實驗室發現聯想電腦這些硬體與「韌體」(firmware,電腦硬碟與軟體間的連結)的弱點後,該品牌電腦自二○○○年代中期起遭到英國情報單位抵制。
聯想「後門」 可遠端遙控電腦
「澳洲金融評論報」說,科學家已辨識出聯想電腦所用晶片中的高度機密「後門」,這些極度難以鑑別的「後門」可從遠端啟動,以阻止目標電腦運作或取得其內容。
報導說,雖然公部門仍使用聯想電腦,處理非敏感性業務,不過從美國的中央情報局到英國的軍情五處、軍情六處等單位,只要是機密文件網路皆拒絕使用聯想電腦。
聯想電腦對上述指稱表示訝異,並否認其電腦有任何缺點。總部設在北京的聯想電腦獲中國政府間接支持,官方機構中國科學院持有聯想控股逾三分之一股份,是聯想集團最大股東。
聯想於二○○五年購入國際商業機器公司(IBM)的個人電腦部門後,迅速成為全球科技產業巨擘,去年營收達兩百九十億美元,市佔率近十七%,為全球個人電腦最大製造商。
聯想是繼電信製造商華為公司之後,又一家其硬體引發安全疑慮、並與中國政府有關的公司。今年初華為被禁止參與價值高達兩百四十億英鎊的澳洲寬頻建設投標競爭。本月間,美國前中情局長海登也在接受「澳洲金融評論報」訪問時指控華為,將國外的電信系統細節提供給中國政府。



品質眾生相 (71):


《英漢雙解 出版印刷詞典》An English-Chinese Dictionary of Printing and Publishing by P. H. Collin 外語教學與研究  2002
這本英文本是為Window 95年代寫的. 現在已陳舊不堪.
英文本最大的問題是完全無圖.
中譯的問題是隨便亂譯  譬如說 Murphy’s Law (271頁)


品質眾生相 (70)  考古

2006.9.14
Canon said it will inspect as many as 1.87 million personal copiers shipped world-wide because of a danger they may catch fire or generate smoke from overheating.


佳能擬檢測187萬台影印機
陳穎柔/綜合外電報導


    MSNBC.com報導指出,影印機大廠佳能產於一九八七至一九九七年間的影印機傳出有起火之虞,該公司於是在周二宣布,將對這一八七萬台已銷往全球各地的影印機進行檢測,並免費提供零件更換服務。

    佳能在一九八七至一九九七年間生產的影印機共有十一種機款,這次受檢的影印機擴及這十一款,一八七萬台影印機中賣到北美的占四三.八五%,銷往歐洲和日本分別占三六.八九%和七.五%,賣到其它地區的占一一.七六%。


    佳能指出,這些影印機的線路出了問題,可能導致機器過熱,然後會冒煙或著火,從一九九二年起,就陸續傳出三起機器過熱事件,最近一起發生在今年七月,不過並無人因此受傷,佳能此次做免費檢測及零件更換預計花費一七○萬美元。

    分析師們認為,這起最新的已售機器大規模回廠受檢新聞不致衝擊佳能財報。佳能近年來的獲利表現相當亮麗。

    在佳能宣布將檢測已售出之影印機的消息之前,日本消費電子業界陸續傳出大量回收產品的消息。戴爾和蘋果電腦分別在八月宣布回收筆記型電腦的鋰電池,因為這 些電池可能著火,戴爾擬回收四一○萬顆瑕疵電池,蘋果則要回收一八○萬顆,這些電池係由新力一家子公司所製造,而本月稍早,松下電器回收六千顆 Panasonic品牌筆記型電腦的電池,原因是這些電池有過熱之虞。

網誌存檔