分享普林斯頓大學校長對於"大學排名制"的批評和反省 (該校經常名列前茅)。很值得讀讀
...ranking colleges is a dubious enterprise...
...I prefer alumni satisfaction 10 years post-graduation, though that information is harder to gather...
"......大學排名是一個可疑的事業......
" ...我更喜歡畢業 10 年後的校友滿意度,儘管這些信息更難收集..."
Here is a partial list of other factors that matter: net cost (that is, cost of tuition and fees minus financial aid — again, for students like the applicant); a high-quality faculty actively engaged in undergraduate instruction, including through the individualized supervision of independent work; and a learning culture composed of diverse students who study hard and educate one another.
以下是其他重要因素的部分清單:淨成本(即學費和雜費減去經濟援助的成本——同樣,對於像申請人這樣的學生); 高素質的教師積極參與本科教學,包括通過對獨立工作的個性化監督; 以及一種由努力學習和相互教育的多元化學生組成的學習文化。
(以上參考中文都由Google 機械翻譯)
WASHINGTONPOST.COM
Opinion | I lead America’s top-ranked university. Here’s why these rankings are a problem.
What student applicants and their parents need is a Consumer Rep
(以上參考中文都由Google 機械翻譯)
WASHINGTONPOST.COM
Opinion | I lead America’s top-ranked university. Here’s why these rankings are a problem.
What student applicants and their parents need is a Consumer Rep
沒有留言:
張貼留言